Uncovering LGBTQ Londinium

Fibreglass replica of a life-size bronze head of Hadrian found in the Thames in 1834

Original in the British Museum

2022 will mark the 1900th anniversary of the Roman Emperor Hadrian’s visit to Londinium. When Hadrian visited the city in the year 122 CE, his entourage included young men with whom he was clearly intimate.

He would have been entirely open about it, and many bystanders will have thought his behaviour quite normal, if only because they themselves had same-sex relationships. But it is only recently that scholars have come to accept that such attitudes prevailed in Roman London.

Forty years ago I was a university student, reading Greek and Latin literature. Since then not only have our attitudes to LGBTQ+ issues changed, but so has our understanding of Roman London. In those days many archaeologists believed that metropolitan Roman culture had little impact upon so distant a province as Britain. This may be true for many regions of Britain, but writing tablets discovered during recent digs in London show that society here was organised in much the same way as in Rome itself, for at least the first century of the city’s existence.

Fragment of an Attic cup showing homosexual intercourse, 550-525BCE

Collection the Louvre Museum. Public domain.

Our understanding of the ancient world has changed radically over the last forty years. 1978 saw the publication of Kenneth Dover’s book, Greek Homosexuality. While it had long been obvious to anyone who studied Greek vase-painting that same-sex relationships were ubiquitous in that society, the matter was usually side-stepped in lectures and student essays. Homosexuality had been decriminalised in Britain just a decade earlier. The photographs for Dover’s book had to be delivered to the printer by hand, because the post might have been intercepted under Section 11 of the Post Office Act (1953), which banned sending “indecent or obscene prints” by mail.

Greek Homosexuality is not a comprehensive account of same-sex relationships in the Greek world. In fact Dover was mainly concerned with a particular type of sexual relationship, between an older man – the active party, the ‘lover’ – and a younger man or boy – the passive party, the ‘beloved’. Such relationships were normal in 5th-century BC Greece, and were seen as a rite of passage for both parties at the respective stages in their lives. The older male would often have female partners. However, given the vastly different social context of ancient Greece, we should resist the temptation to describe such men as ‘bisexual’ in the modern sense. Still, sex between men was deeply embedded in Greek society.

Perfume bottle made of cameo glass found in the Roman necropolis of Ostippo (Spain). 1st century BCE or CE.

Side B of the bottle, portrayed above, shows two young men in bed. Collection of George Ortiz.

There is no need to use Dover’s lover-beloved model to explain Hadrian’s devotion to Antinous, because there is plentiful evidence for same-sex relationships in the second century CE. Sex between a citizen and the wife of another citizen counted as adultery, but there was no law to regulate sex with slaves or others of inferior social status (male or female). It was much more important for a Roman man to preserve his image by being seen to be the superior, active party, and his partner the passive. The idea of ‘homosexual’ and ‘heterosexual’ did not yet exist - what mattered was to be sexually dominant .

Now we know from documents that the Londinium of Hadrian’s time was a slave-owning society, sharing the same values as citizens throughout the Roman empire, we can be sure that same-sex relationships were normal. But it would be a mistake to regard that society as sexually ‘liberated’ or as having much in common with present-day LGBTQ values and definitions. There is much we should find reprehensible. Both in Greece and Rome many people would have had sexual relationships at a time when, by modern standards, they were appallingly under-age. Disparities of status and power were ruthlessly enforced physically, often with violence.