Caitlin Davies

Author, Bad Girls: a History
of Rebels and Renegades

13 March 2018

From prison to parliament: the Suffragettes & Holloway

Holloway prison was, at the time of the fight for female suffrage, the largest women’s prison in Europe. Hundreds of Suffragettes were incarcerated there, many suffering hunger strikes as they continued their campaigning from within the prison walls. Caitlin Davies’s book Bad Girls delves into the history of Holloway, shedding new light on the extraordinary stories of the women imprisoned there, including the Suffragettes.

A history of Rebels and Renegades, in Holloway Prison.

Caitlin Davies, author of Bad Girls: a History of Rebels and Renegades

This banner was designed for the Chelsea branch of the Women's Social and Political Union (W.S.P.U) by Herman Ross. It was first unfurled at the Queen's Hall on 17 June 1908 in preparation for Women's Sunday on 21 June. The painted banner depicts two policemen guarding the entrance to Holloway prison, out of which a suffragette prisoner can be seen waving a banner with the slogan 'Votes for Women'. The base of the banner is decorated with the W.S.P.U's colours: purple, white and green. By 1911 the Chelsea branch of the union had opened a shop at 308 King's Road for the sale of suffragette merchandise. The shop's basement became a workshop for the design and production of campaign banners.

Banner for the Chelsea Branch of the Women's Social and Political Union, 1908

The painted banner depicts two policemen guarding the entrance to Holloway prison, out of which a suffragette prisoner can be seen waving a banner with the slogan 'Votes for Women'.

When did you first become interested in Holloway prison?

I grew up a short distance away, and like anyone who grew up in Islington in the 1960s I remember it as a kind of medieval castle. I was about seven years old when they started knocking it down for redevelopment, and I remember thinking: who are the women in there, what have they done? When I was training to be a teacher in the late 1980s, I chose to do a work placement in the new Holloway prison, because I was scared of imprisonment, and I wanted to see what it was like inside.

I was in there for six weeks, teaching creative writing in the education centre. I learnt a lot, about the prison, and why women were there: many had been coerced into bringing drugs into the country, for example.

Later, while working as a journalist in Botswana I was arrested and put on trial twice, each time facing a two year sentence. The charges were dropped in the first case, and in the second I was acquitted but my source was imprisoned.

When I heard that Holloway was closing down a few years ago, I thought this is my last chance to write its full history. So I went in to research the prison, and interview the governor, chaplain, wardens and the last prisoner to be released. The officers gave her a sort of parade when she came out, holding up their batons.

Suffragette banner composed of 80 rectangular pieces of linen sewn together and bordered by green and purple panels. The 80 pieces of linen are embroidered in purple cotton with the signatures of eighty Suffragette hunger-strikers who, by 1910, had 'faced death without flinching'. Along the top is embroidered 'Women's Social and Political Union' in Scottish art nouveau style along with the names of the suffragette leaders Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenney. The banner was first carried in the 'From Prison to Citizenship' procession in June 1910 to symbolise the spirit of comradeship that gave suffragette prisoners the strength and courage to endure hunger strike and force feeding.

WSPU Holloway Prisoners Banner

Embroidered with the signatures of eighty Suffragette hunger-strikers who, by 1910, had 'faced death without flinching'.

How did that personal connection change the way you wrote about Holloway?

What I wanted to do with Bad Girls was not to write a dry history, but to tell the stories of the women who were there, both the inmates and the staff. So I went on the hunt to find women who had been imprisoned or worked there. I found relatives of the Duchess of Sutherland, who was jailed in 1890.

She was married to one of the richest men in the western world, and after he died there was a family argument over a will. She had burnt an important document and was charged with contempt of court for refusing to reveal its contents. Sending a Duchess to the biggest women’s prison, where she’ll be alongside women charged with vagrancy or prostitution: it was intended to take her down a peg or two.

She was sent to Holloway as, essentially, a lesson: Holloway was used to make women know their place in one way or another.

The first Suffragettes imprisoned in Holloway.

'The Holloway Three': Annie Kenney, Adelaide Knight and Jane Sparborough

Among the first Suffragettes imprisoned in Holloway, in June 1906 for protesting at Herbert Asquith's house.

Was that also why the Suffragettes were sent to Holloway prison?

The first Suffragette arrived at Holloway in 1906. To begin with, the Suffragettes were bound over to keep the peace, asked to promise not to re-offend, and given a fine. When they refused to pay the fine, they were sent to Holloway. As they escalated from minor acts of street protest to criminal damage, they received more severe sentences.

In the same way, they escalated their resistance to Holloway’s prison rules. As more Suffragettes were imprisoned, they fought with prison authorities more and more.

When the leading lights of the suffrage campaign arrived at Holloway they would be put in the prison hospital, to keep them away from the hundreds of other Suffragettes already imprisoned. Behaviour would spread between prisoners, so if one smashed a window to improve the ventilation, the others would as well. The governor had a breakdown and left. He found the Suffragettes a thorn in his side and thought the press helped to encourage them.

Mary Leigh and Edith New, the first suffragette window smashers, after their release from Holloway prison, 22nd August 1908. Mary Leigh and Edith New had both given up their teaching careers to become involved in the militant suffragette campaign. On 30 June 1908 they carried out the first window-smashing attack when they broke windows at 10 Downing Street, the official residence of the British Prime Minister. On their release from prison after serving two months they were greeted by a delegation of suffragettes that included Christabel Pankhurst. Presented with purple, white and green bouquets they were conducted to a waiting carriage. Here they can be seen in the carriage holding aloft loaves of bread smuggled out of the prison.

Mary Leigh and Edith New released from Holloway, 22 August 1908

The first Suffragette window smashers, Mary and Edith were imprisoned in Holloway for breaking windows at 10 Downing Street.

Designed by Sylvia Pankhurst, this silver Holloway brooch incorporates a silver portcullis, representing parliament, with a central, enamel convict's arrow in the suffragette colours of purple, white and green. The brooch was awarded by the Women's Social and Political Union to members who served a period of imprisonment for their militant suffragette activity.

Holloway Brooch, 1909

The brooch was awarded by the Women's Social and Political Union to members who served a period of imprisonment for their militant suffragette activity.

Did the Suffragettes seek to publicity from their imprisonment?

This was the time when the British public first learnt what was going on inside Holloway prison. You had up to 200 suffragettes being admitted on a single day. These were often educated women, some with influential friends. They were clearly documenting what was going on, they hoarded their arrest warrants, smuggled out letters, kept secret diaries. When they were released they would be greeted with cheering crowds and given a medal, the Holloway brooch. Sometimes they would give interviews to journalists on the day of their release. They didn’t just promote the cause of suffrage, but also wanted to make things better for the women imprisoned in Holloway.

Holloway was based on the separate and silent system: you were isolated in your cell and no-one was supposed to talk to each other. The Suffragettes started defying prison discipline and making constant complaints and demands. At first the suffragettes looked at penal reform as distracting from their core purpose of getting the vote. Then these campaigning women would go to the prison chapel and see 16 year old girls and ask, why are they here?

Did they succeed in making things better?

They had a variety of different goals- one was to change how Suffragettes were treated. Holloway had different divisions of prisoners, a kind of class system- first division prisoners could order in their own food and wine, and have someone clean their cell. They could have visitors and letters. To begin with suffragettes were not put in that class.

In theory it was the crime that determined an inmate’s division. If you were found guilty of libel or were from a privileged class you would be put in first division. The big thing for the suffragettes was they wanted to be recognised as political prisoners, so that was why they went on hunger strike. This was another way they were fighting the system. The hunger strike was, if we’re not going to be treated as first class prisoners then we will refuse to obey the rules and we will refuse to eat.

As well as the resistance, they would sometimes have fun in the prison: the Suffragettes organised a mock election, played games, produced a magazine. There’s a wonderful scrapbook recording all this that was kept by a woman named Olive Wharry. She was actually declared insane by the prison medical officer- she had burned down Kew Gardens tea pavilion and was on hunger strike for about five weeks. It was easier to pathologise female defiance than engage with it politically. It was very handy to say that the Suffragettes were insane.

Surveillance image depicting Suffragette prisoners exercising in the yard of Holloway jail. The prisoners are identified on the reverse of the photo from left to right as Margaret Scott, Jane Short (the alias used by Rachel Peace) May [Margaret] McFarlane and Olive Hockin. This was one in a series of surveillance images taken by an undercover photographer hiding in a van parked in the yard. The photographs were commissioned by the Home Office and distributed widely to public buildings including museums and galleries to prevent the miltants entering premises and causing damage. It is likely the image was taken in June 1913 when all four Suffragettes were serving terms of imprisonment in Holloway for various offences.

Surveillance photograph of Suffragettes in the yard of Holloway prison, 1913

Margaret Scott, Jane Short, May McFarlane and Olive Hockin were secretly photographed to aid the police in supressing Suffragette activity.

How else did the prison authorities deal with the Suffragettes?

Something I really wanted to find out was how the Suffragettes related to the female prison wardresses. I was fascinated to read the diary of Alice Hawkins, a working-class Suffragette, who worked as a machinist. She really identified with the non-suffragette prisoners and also with the prison staff.

There was definitely a close relationship. A lot of Suffragettes wrote about wardresses who comforted them, who held them while they sobbed. But at the same time these female staff were holding them down while they were force-fed.

That sounds brutal, how did the Suffragettes cope with that?

There was a support network. They rented a house on Dalmeny Avenue near the prison, where they housed Suffragettes who had just left Holloway. They also used this as a headquarters and would serenade the prisoners from the roof of this house. When the Suffragettes finally bombed the prison, in 1913, they did it from that house’s garden.

Damage caused by attempt to blow up Holloway Gaol, December 1913. This press photograph shows the damage caused by an attempt to blow up Holloway Gaol in December 1913.

Suffragettes attempt to blow up Holloway prison, 1913

According to a report in 'The Times' the next day, two loud explosions at around 9.30pm caused two holes in the wall and broke the windows of surrounding houses.

Creative commons.

Protesters at Greenham Common Women's Peace Camp, 1982

On New Year's Eve, 1982, 44 women broke into RAF Greenham Common military base to protest the siting of American cruise missiles there. 36 were imprisoned in Holloway. Creative Commons licence.

What do you think has been the legacy of the Suffragette movement?

They have been an extraordinary inspiration. Here is a large group of women who were refusing to obey the rules. And as the years go by you see parallels with other groups- the initial Women of Greenham Common March used the Suffragette colours of white, green and purple. They were very aware of those connections, not least because many of them were imprisoned in Holloway themselves.

In 2017, the feminist direct action group Sisters Uncut occupied the Holloway visitors’ centre. They used the words of the suffragettes on their banners: deeds not words. They set off smoke bombs in the colours of the suffragettes. When I heard that I said, well, that’s the last chapter of my book sorted!

The Suffragette leaders Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst dressed in replica prison clothing. Replica prison uniforms were often worn by ex-suffragette prisoners at demonstrations and fund-raising bazaars to highlight the conditions under which imprisoned Suffragettes were held.

Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst, 1909

Replica prison uniforms were often worn by ex-suffragette prisoners at demonstrations and fund-raising bazaars to highlight the conditions under which imprisoned Suffragettes were held.

Why do you think it’s important to remember the fight for women’s suffrage?

The obvious thing is that the struggle is far from over. If you look at prisons and the reason that women are in prison now, those haven’t changed from the days of the Suffragettes- sexual violence, domestic abuse, drug and alcohol abuse.

I think that the struggle of the suffrage movement is something that children should be taught properly about at school. Children today learn about things like the Cat and Mouse Act, but I think they learn a story of victimisation rather than story of bravery. Someone described Holloway as the graduating university for militancy. They organised and we need to remember that. We need to know the real story of the Suffragettes.

Caitlin Davies is the author of Bad Girls: a History of Rebels and Renegades.

Hear her and other authors speak on The Suffragette Legacy at the Museum of London on 24 March.

Visit our free display, Votes for Women, at the Museum of London throughout 2018, or find out more about our events and displays to commemorate the centenary of women's Suffrage.